How can you ask others for some thing what you dont do yourself?
Go in a sex shop and buy some.
Has any one ever been to aarows on a sunday afternoon?
Been there and done it, for a swingers club in sydney. Gone are the days where a casette of Super8 costed $ 10 and played for 3.5 minutes, gone are the days where people used VHS-C which gave good results with TV's up to 32 inches.
miniDV with its restrictions by using tape is ok for TV's to 36 inches. Todays lover of dearest memories records on miniHD or memory cards (class 4 or higher). However, also gone are the days where the results had been instandly available.
I am writing this for people interested in this subject, who may have questions or who need a camera person.
Todays industry has managed very well to confuse the crap out of the consumer and here is what I have found. Youtube and some tv stations refer to 720 as HD (high definition) and 1080 as true HD. Well, 720 (720 x 576) is indeed DVD quality suitable to tv's up to 46 inches and the quality of Bluray is still perfect at 55 inch tv's. To confuse things further, maufacturers are now making claims of HD-quality by quoting the vertical pixel count. Here a clarification:
HD? = 720 x 576 pixels DVD quality, pixles are horizontaly stretched!
true HD = 1920 x 1080 pixels, pixels are square
??? 1440 x 1080 pixels are stretched and of lower quality (Panasonic lite, Sony and Canon).
All tv transmissions are interlaced scan today which can only be displayed with a tube type tv, example 720 x 576i
All flat screen tv's can only display progressive scan and the interlaced signal is deinterlaced, example 720 x 576p, which gives better quality!
Todays HD-cameras record mostly in Mpeg4 and h264 for HD-quality. This involves conversion to Mpeg2 for DVD's. If the conversion is done with 9000 pixels/second, the quality on a 46 inch tv is outstanding.
A lot more fun is however converting to Bluray in HD-quality. Firstly, I purchsed the software to convert to ISO and UDF.
Then I purchased a Panasonic Bluray recorder which had been on special, just to find out that Panasonic and others do not use the standard ISO (but lay claim) or UDF codec, but have their own which is mt2. This is a Mpeg2 codec with 1920 x 1080p pixel resolution, the conversion on my laptop takes all night. The results are astonishing, one can see ever single hair (on the head). When you buy a camera, do not get fooled by the specified pixels, it is also the lens which makes the difference and this limits the zoom, usually 50 times, on my camra to 5 times. For true HD-quality of 1920 x 1080p, the camera needs 8.2 million pixels and should record at least 15 million pixels per second.
And now, it seems that every one is recording in HD-3D?
Some people (moa included) just go in to see who is there and most important how far away they are with 30% on average
not providing this information. In the meantime, up to 4 chat requests pop up from people who have not even read the profile.
There is a much nicer way, called "message", which can be read and answered to in timly fashion.
...and is also not very polite as you can see yourself!
sydneycouple73 is not a couple but only operates as a single male.
Weather permitting, we will be there for a short time. How will we know who belongs to the group? PM is ok.
...and that lady is born in 2011 with no other features!
True, you will find a lot of cheaters on this site which accepts members without pictures, age or locations. Love them, they get blocked instandly. It is very simple, just put in your add that where some one poses as a couple, then a meeting will only take place with both of them showing up. That works!
Either way, he has 70 virgins waiting for him, what a way to go.
There are lots of programs which can do a lot to improve pichtures like "paint" from windows which is manual or "cam2pc" with its automatic functions but the best is to do it right from the beginning.
Put a nylon stocking or panty hose over the camera lens, this results in the smoothest of photos, often used by professionals.
Remember that the fabric will be out of focus, thus removing imperfections from the image.
Always use the lowest possible aperture setting to avoid depth of field. With a digital camera avoid reflections or pure white in the picture as most of them struggle in reproducing a grayscale of 8.
Never use direct lighting, where there is a lot of light, there is a lot of shadow. Always use indirect lighting by directing the flash on to the ceiling and open the lens by 4 stops.
Whilst black and white shots can give good results, for the nude human body monochrome should be used, either sepia or red light.
It would be of interest, not every one likes Parramatta in the evening.
Reading, spelling, sex, so much to learn in life. If they are no good in the first two, then they wont know any thing about the last.
1) it is Aarows and not Arrows, its written on the outside of the place is you look.
2) the record is some where over 100, but is this still sex?
3) we have never seen a porn video which was realistic.
4) no one can tell any one what to ask as every one has a different attitude!
Join politics and you dont have to stop.
Dont worry, at that age they can not read.
It is all a matter of choice.
It's not whom she goes out with that matters but to whom she comes back to. Men often have the big swinging ideas but dont consider their own fear when the other guy performs better.
Dont consider any visual stimulation like videos, women are different and chances are that this could turn her off completely. Also, what you see in videos is acted and not real!
The best suggestion is to get to know a couple which are swingers on a social base, this way you can find out what her resons may be against and what for it. The resons could have been formed on wrong perceptions. It is on the end all a matter of confidence and find out how you may act, when you see for the first time your wife enjoying her self.
Reading the various mails on here, it is obvious that this site is also read by people who turn up with a blue, flashing light on the car roof.
Also, Birdie Beach is watched by the boys in blue from a outlook further south and 2 years ago they turned up with a helicopter. The complaints came from some "genuine nudists" from the northern end of the beach, so a lady told us.
Also, usig the pm-method keeps the riffraff away. With a bit of thinking it becomes clear, why the localities should never be made puplic and-it is illegal, full stop.
And it makes the sand stick together.
We just love the samples given by nomads_oz like: fill my ear with cum until it comes out the other ear, can we read any more of these ?
Sure, single guys can be a problem as they have nothing to loose on this site, some are single with a crying wife at home and some are couples where only the male turns up, claiming his wife is at the moment overseas. But- couples can be the same problem where a oversaturated husband just wants some thing better to what he has with no interest in sharing.
Each to his own, it can take a very long time for the right connections to be found and on this site it could take for ever.
We can blame the guys, the couples, but waht about the site? A friend of ours, a single male, was here a member for 10 hours and then he left.
If this site insisted on photos and locality to be given to accept a profile, then every thing would be different. We would know if some one is located in Brisbane or Perth and we would know if we are looking at a person or a ape.
"why are single guys so disliked here", was the topic. Because they dont turn up. You dont need a encylopedia to find that out. The first identifier is when they expect others to have profile photos but dont have any them selves and also hide the locality. The best is to block them on the first contact.
Oops
Sorry, that member doesn't exist!
Surely it is Aarows? I must have a look my self this saturday evening.
Been there, never again.
LOL, you too?
Its not a sand island but a island with bushes after you entered the nude area and to get there, you have to cross a river.
Been there a few times, no regrets.